♪ The Cape Forum ♪
"According to a boring "final solution" and a disappointing "resolution"
Owner: Yuan Jin-kyu Time: 2021-07-27 12:20:29 Click: 90514 reply: 279
I am a member of resolution 10, and participating in this "final solution" has only two words - disappointment.
It stems from the fact that we do not have a "final" awareness, nor have we "solved" any problems, let alone proposed any "programs".
In both the reservations and the cover-up of the candidates, as well as the subjective assumption that the resolution makers were unable to unite themselves on one face, the resolutionmakers did not see any candidate, nor did they display any good qualities, and all left only one lucky child in haste. All of this has nothing to do with the new world and the message of God, or even human beings, so let's make it simple: "Let's kill three people and leave one, let's start".
It is far from what I had intended to do, that I did not want to take the floor after several attempts to steer the way.
I was a writer, and I came with a full view of the world and values, and designed three periods of transition from the old to the new world, and designed a complete operating mechanism for the social fabric of the new world and a social ethic that matched it. I want to use this framework to draw the bricks, to be criticized and to be blamed. Unfortunately, no one has any thoughts or expectations about the new world, but the empty repetition of the word "good" over and over and over again, without much discussion, is full of obscurantism and obscurantism and even a once insinuation in the subject of primitive desires, and the glorification of sexuality as an inspiration for art and culture. If, after centuries of art and culture, the world has come to an end, we are considering how to create art and how to use even earlier inspiration to create it, not art, but "actural art".
If all people, including those who organized us together, are not aware of the threat to survival, have no vision of a new world, have no claim to freedom, equality, rights, neither expect a better world, nor exclude a worse world, then there is really no need to debate, simply create a "god", and it is only reasonable to throw a dice at everyone.
Author: Xiaoxiang. Time: 2021-07-27 13:21:02
Feels like there's a lot of anger out there. If there is one, it's just that we're not there. I'd like to hear your advice.
Time: 2021-07-27 13:22:22:22
Holy shit, is that a stupid solution? Fortunately for the other organization, I knew the rules that they were doing would not work, or they would have to be killed first!
Time: 2021-07-27 13:24:01
It's not anger, it's just disappointment, it's not as fair as I thought, but I'm not in a position, and I don't have to give them the rules.
Author: Love your baby for life. Time: 2021-07-27 13:24:01
Tell me, we're listening. Maybe your opinion will be used.
By Yuan Kim-kyu Time: 2021-07-27 15:48:56
Then I'll give you a brief description of my ass. It's not impossible! Tomorrow, you and my friends' bodies will be chewed down by wild dogs, your ashes will be cooked and muddled, and the day after tomorrow I will be killed as a pig dog and cut off my limbs and cast into a vase. Next week, the society will return to slavery, and we will be slashing the fire, and civilization will return to the era of new stones, and war will return, plagues will spread and cults will rise. Tonight we do not think about creating or disrupting order, we do not want to be ambitious or saints, we do not want to be martyrs or prophets, we do not want to be avengers or fighters, we do not want to think about what will happen the day after tomorrow, but we are here to ask again and again whether a woman wants to sleep with herself.
Perhaps, as you see it as a release of humanity, I do not see it, and I think that in the face of such existential pressures, human civilization has a better chance of rejuvenation, by which we can break class into a new phase of civilization, breaking the shackles that have not been broken in the millennium. Some humans have thought about how to fly to the universe, and those on the ground are still thinking about what's going on between the beds. Maybe someone who's being questioned will panic. That's what you want, but that's not what I want. I want you to bring out a real world view, values, the cosmos view, a view of civilization, not to repeat the social, philosophical, ethical and moral arguments that exist, but to discuss the end and the future from the perspective of 16 individuals.
So I thought, if it was possible for everyone to prepare some speeches that set out their vision of the world in its entirety, their own role, the political opinions, the real and the false views of the President when he took office, it would not be worthwhile for you to think more and say more in order to get a ticket to a new world.
Author: One shot sent away Time: 2021-07-27 15:51:01
God, I really have to swear! Ask a woman whether she wants to sleep with herself. Who the fuck is that?
Time: 2021-07-2715:51:35
And to put an end to it, five hours of the night, We were caught in a situation of hypocritical premeditation, and a group of unrelated people gathered to argue without focus.
Time: 2021-07-27 16:06:49
You're right! It's your specialty! You've touched it! I personally like what you say! I'd love to see these things on the scene! Every word you say can be recorded in the entire record of every resolution! But you didn't say it! You coward! You're only a keyman!
Time: 2021-07-27 16:11:37
This is an excuse. The problem is a matter of machinery, so I say be prepared. Has anyone really looked at the information and analysed who they are? I made a simple comment about 15 people, sorted out their dimensions. My disappointment also depends on the effort I have made and the reality that has fallen short. I do not believe that other occasions will achieve the results I have hoped for, and mechanisms are the most important factor. To give everyone enough time to show, in five minutes and twenty minutes, that there is nothing to show, and to stand on stage and face everyone's eyes, he exposes ignorance or reservations.
By Yuan Jin-kyu Time: 2021-07-27 16:12:39
I'll take a picture.
Time: 2021-07-27 16:13:39
You're really heartless.
Time: 2021-07-27 16:15:14
You mean give a man 10 minutes to talk? This is a terrible thing.
Author: Hyde's underside dog Time: 2021-07-27 16:16:04
From an early age, the races have not had much access to public discourse, much less to education for logic. A speech in over five minutes will turn into a boring report. Have you thought about it?
Time: 2021-07-27 16:17:15
The mechanism should not be a matter for me to think about, it should be them, and in my view it is still a problem. Whatever the solution, it must be addressed.
Time: 2021-07-27 16:18:14
Half a day, and now we're playing leather again, baby. How does it work? Does your plan work? Can you approach the end?
I hear a new organization has been working on the temple lately.
Time: 2021-07-27 16:18:14
What is most obvious now is that no one has ever made an effective and complete statement of values, and that all the discussions have focused on the few pieces of information that hundreds of words and individuals have revealed, real or false.
Time: 2021-07-27 16:18:27
I don't know if you've ever given a speech in 10 minutes or more? It's pretty hard to meet someone who's good? If it's 5x16, it's 80 minutes! Then you're probably even worse!
Time: 2021-07-27 16:19:09
There's a lot of ways, or the next time a speech fails, you should just kill it.
Time: 2021-07-27 16:19:18
A quarter is still too much.
Author: Boxing to meat Time: 2021-07-27 16:20:39
How can a murder vote be said? Must be emotional! Tension, collapse, anger, helplessness, weakness, anxiety, depression.
But what is still expected of you is that the ceiling of the mechanism is low and that it will encounter a variety of grievances. You have too little time to speak and argue, more than one to talk too much, and each time there are different people and situations, randomly and institutionally unable to solve the problem. I'm glad you're still alive. If it's your way, it's possible you're dead at the scene!
2202-07-27 16:25:18
It's also working. I'll just make a specific suggestion, not necessarily.
With fewer candidates, lower survival rates, more opportunities to express themselves, and more opportunities for survival under the pressure of survival, those who have demonstrated themselves have increased. There may be changes.
Time: 2021-07-27 17:49:11
Perhaps eight candidates, eight resolution makers, could volunteer to remain in a resolution or a candidate, and selection would be made for any seat that was intended to be larger than a seat. For example, when 10 people wanted to be candidates, six of them chose eight out of 10, leaving the seat. If ten people want to be a resolutionr, then the 10 people speak and vote each other to decide which two to be a candidate, which is a game. Too many minutes can be given for five minutes, one round, many rounds, and those who die can join the bench, or they have one vote.
Although they have tried so hard on the mechanism, it is not yet possible to guarantee a good debate each time.
I have put forward a few additional formulations, also in view of the fact that rather than a fragmented debate that is not productive, it is better to produce boring, long but practical ideas.
In fact, I was going to go up and say it for two minutes, but it was too late, and it was too late to say what I wanted to say and what I wanted to say, and I would say that I would divide the world into two layers, feed humanity at the bottom with a communist system, and ensure human thought and scientific advancement at the upper levels with a parliamentary system. Everybody's gonna look like shit. What the hell is this guy doing?
There's peeping, and I think peeping can lead to deeper values. I don't think it's right to peep, each soul has its own familiar system of discussion, and it is inevitable that after a long period of time each person will end up in a similar question-and-answer session in which he or she will end up having all-powerful questions to question the participants, and if the participants do not have a clear view, the rest may end up just the same questions and the same answers.
And in our case, the whole night, we had a lot of noise, and we didn't go around looking at a simple question. On the question of whether or not to have sex with the resolution-makers, I would also like to say that, even if the candidates would or would not, they would be of little value and would not have room for more in-depth discussion, or that very few people would have had enough discussion of the issue, so passiveness became a loathing. For example, asking who was objet petit a woman's masturbation, whoever answered, the best effect would be to make a group of people happy.
Well, I'm tired of saying that I hope that the final solution will go far for their fairness and justice, and I think the mechanism must be perfected, or I will continue to be sad and sad.
Author: Boxing to meat Time: 2021-07-27 20:25:39
Is it possible that the majority of the population will be full of philosophies, ideas and ideas? Can't you have sex? I want to live with me.
How can I have a baby if I'm dead?
Author: Love your baby for life. Time: 2021-07-27 20:25:48
The owner wrote it with a lot of heart.
Author: Big bowl. Time: 2021-07-27 22:29:18.
Put the post on top, expose the solution, disassembly them, trashy methods.
Time: 2021-07-28 01:38:38
Support for exposure!
Author: Liso inaccessible Time: 2021-07-28 02:18:34
Support for exposure!
Author: A career traitor
Support for exposure! Fight against the further brainwashing of evil groups!
Submitted by: One shot delivered Time: 2021-07-28 05:21:01
Stay in formation! Support for exposure! Fight against the further brainwashing of evil groups!
Time: 2021-07-28 05:21:02
Damn it!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next page
We're in contact with you.
1999 - 2021 Cape Community
The final solution is a fictional organization in the works of Operation Purple.