Official response

Today, the programme group of the highest institutions for the final settlement has received a public response that some of the participants in a web-based forum have questioned the design of the resolution process, expressed their views on its fair and equitable approach and received much feedback.

After research and discussion, the Programme Group decided to issue a firm statement on the situation.

First of all, the Programme Group, on behalf of the final solution, was grateful for the valuable input of the minority, Yuan Xiaokui, and the spirit of frankness was one of the most important qualities of the Programme Group's resolutions in response to the Enlightenment. With regard to the problems that have arisen on the ground, we will do our best to investigate them and to re-engineer the parameters of the members of the peep sessions.

However, when Mr. Yuan's call for a resolution to be made in earnest is more focused on the form of so-called ideas and theories, we ask the question: What is your position to decide what others say in the resolution? Go talk about your favorites, start talking, it's your right. It is also the right of others to talk about sex and ask a woman who wants to have sex with herself. The resolution of the final settlement would be the most important and central part, namely, non-interference in talking about content. This is by no means irresponsible of life, but rather guarantees true justice to life resolutions in a way that does not limit language.

The Programme Group reiterated once again that the resolution of the final settlement would be designed to deal with the great catastrophes brought about by the inspiration and to try to resolve the problems of the former world. The resolution would not be a mere conversation of ideas, nor an effort to find an elite nation, but rather a desire for every individual to discuss and talk in his own way and to fight for his right to exist, with equal respect for the lives and will of others. For your worth! For your emotions! For your own ethics! Stand up to clarify, prove, discuss and find a chance for consensus! Without each person's serious defence of his or her self, there will be no other person's voluntary compromise, much less a whole and united post-world.

At the same time, the final solution must strongly criticize some of the actions that have taken place in online forums in the name of the world of love and love, but which have led to isolation, the shaping of antagonisms, the failure to face real problems, and the lack of human resources. In the former world, the final solution will not be content with such people, and in the latter world, we will stand firm as always!

It is on the basis of the established fact that separation from three quarters of the population is something that we all do not want to see, and that violence and blood are something that we do not want to bear, that the final solution advocates non-violent deliberation and voting to resolve the difficulties we encounter. Speaking out, reaching consensus with those who disagree, trying to talk to and persuade each other, and ultimately choosing our partners who we want to walk side by side in the post-world, reshaping the rules and regulations that we want for the functioning of our societies will reverse and eventually reach hope.

Let us work together for a final solution and for the future.

Final solution Group

"The Post-World only covers the world."

Post-World is the only official medium for a final settlement.

All reports/contacts/proposals/submissions should be scanned 2D above

Operation Purple is fictional art.

The final solution is a fictional organization in the works of Operation Purple.

The Sea Cape Community is the online forum of Operation Purple.

This article responds to a comment by Yuan Jin-kyu, a national of the Sea Cape Community, about the Disappointing Resolution

Click on pictures to jump into the original text