To put it simply, why would I choose the establishment?
He Fa was the founder of 510 and P4 Theater, so the overall appearance is linked to his own strong emotions and colours, which cannot be overstated. However, there may be some negative consequences, similar to dealing with their status as "participants" and "managers". And some of these developments have run counter to the foundational points created by p4 and 510 and are far from being compatible.
I value the 510 platform, the one that's very dynamic here, is a huge energy field. The second is that we already lack such a platform, an era of universal cynicism and cowardice. "This is savagery, fragmentation, hysteria, varnished, easy mobility. As LOGO marks, the spirit and matter will collide and convert at this high speed to write automatically about our future." It's hard not to say that it was shaken and inspired, and I'm ready to shout for it. Something of value is worth my efforts. So my position is that existence is proof of the importance of maintaining this collective unless his life is no longer sufficient.
I will use some ways to avoid being consumed by some of my own characteristics. Of course, if it is some sort of over-the-counter, or a complete "unanimity" in form and content, forget it. Any management approach is reasonable, but it is also phased in. The intervention and design of managers are needed to consider the continuity of the community, rather than the organization with its own head. The more organic an institution is, the less leadership is needed. 510 is obviously not this far. At the same time, it's not supposed to happen here. An embryonic stage can be wild, but much more requires platform awareness and cannot interfere with the whole body by personal will; it should also be designed when it is of a certain scale. Likewise, I strongly recommend management under the innovative line, or even a combination of both.
So, 510, the basic ideas and the tone that exist remain the same, with only some minor adjustments in the way.
Here is how I propose to manage this
1. Stop scolding anyone for QU and RU. Except for voluntary departures, all passive departures must take place in a public environment. The criteria for the rise to the gong incident are determined by public opinion (e.g. the expulsion of He Fa is more frequent), and any personal grievance or physical assault is theoretically unacceptable. As p4 says, "Go and connect everyone who wants to see a newer person." Without rejecting any speaker or participant and living together under one roof, it is to be hoped that we can all cherish that fate together.
2. Building documentation awareness. All that has happened in the past should be kept, video, video, text, and, under the existing section, backup to a certain location to create a web-based document library.
Support for the "rotation of cluster owners". But I personally lacked the language, and I have since recommended a popular referendum to choose the manager; at this stage, He Fa is working very hard, and his state is fully understandable. So there is a need for collective power in the design of the system. Rotation managers are a good practice to draw good lessons for implementation.
4. Start wai sex! Let everyone know! To participate in all kinds of online and offline meetings is not understood, but to do so, I am doing my best to introduce here.
5. On-line and off-line activities, open channels and create synergies. The Community video is updated on a daily basis and tweets are transmitted in groups, and progress under the line needs to be seen. Start a video, a group meeting, even a chat.
In conclusion, today's work needs to be done.
In-group voting: "Can He Fa return to the 510 Café?"