Third subject of analysis: comprehensive exploration of Thomas Ogden's "third presence" theory
Part I. Rationale for "Third presence"
The understanding of the therapeutic relationship itself has evolved profoundly in the course of the development of psychoanalytic theory. This evolution reached a theoretical peak in the work of the contemporary psychoanalyst Thomas Ogden, from the field where it was initially considered a one-way projection to the later recognition of the complexity of two-way interaction. The notion of "third presence" or "analytical third" proposed by Ogden is not only a recharacterization of the therapeutic relationship, but a recasting of the introspective dimension. It conceptualized the invisible and dynamic space of interaction between analysts and analysts in the situation, as a "third subject" with its own vitality. The purpose of this section is to lay out the core theoretical framework of the "third presence", from its basic definition, the inherent mechanism of the dialectic campaign, to the way in which it is generated and perceived in clinical situations, to reveal this complex and innovative theory in depth.
1.1 Definition of inter-main domain: a third subject
The core definition of "third presence" is that it is a psychological entity created by both parties to analyse the sum of individuals. It is not a static space or metaphor, but a dynamic, dominant presence.
Core definitions
"Third presence" is defined as "the analytically created unconscious life of the economy". It is a "intermediary, inter-subjective space" that emerges between analysts and patients through an unconscious process of communication. This space is not just a meeting place between two minds, but what Ogden calls the "third subjectivity", which appears to "take its own life in the human realm". This positioning itself represents a profound theoretical shift: The focus of psychoanalysis has shifted from archaeological excavations of the individual ' s inner psychological world to participation in and understanding of a new, living psychological reality in relationships. This nascent entity has become a unique place where "the ideas, illusions and feelings that could otherwise have been silenced have been mobilized and revealed".
This shift in the theoretical framework means that the objective of psychoanalyst is no longer simply to "know" the inner world of the patient - a task at the intellectual level; it is to participate in and understand the input at the level of "being" - an ontological level - of a new life in a therapeutic relationship. The language of Ogden has always been the color of this introspective theory, and he talks about a "co-created unconscious life" and a "third subject of analysis". This is not just the language of the instrument of understanding, but the language of existence itself. When the theory emphasizes that this "third subject" is "unable to predict through prior knowledge of either party", it directly challenges the traditional notion that analysts are merely discovering the facts inside the patient. Instead, analysts and patients are working together to create something completely new. The commitment to this introspective approach also explains why it is difficult to grasp the concept completely from a purely scientific or neuroscientific point of view, since the latter generally presupposes the physical and mental development of individuals with boundaries and independence. The presence of "third presence" in the "body/individual" space is a relationship reality that cannot be reduced to an individual component. Thus, "third presence" is not only a tool for understanding patients, but is in itself the medium of an analytical process, a new form of existence that must be experienced, felt and ultimately understood only retroactively. This goes hand in hand with the concern of the late Ogden for "physical psychoanalysis".
Joint creation and asymmetries
Although the "third presence" is the product of co-creation, its formation is not entirely reciprocal. The form and content of this "third" element "is largely determined by the patient's internal object world, his unconscious illusions and defence systems". This reveals the asymmetries inherent in therapeutic relationships: the subjectivity of analysts is consciously and disciplinedly applied to the search for the inner world of the patient. Although the analyst is a co-creater, his role is as a container and a converter, and his personal experience is used to understand and symbolize patient-led unconscious dynamics.
An emerging psychological entity.
"Third presence" is described as a "new human domain" or "third subject", which is "generated spontaneously from the interaction of two minds and cannot be predicted on the basis of prior knowledge of either party". This underscores its sudden and unpredictable nature. It is not a simple addition of qualities already available to analysts and patients, but rather a product of a qualitative transformation, a completely new psychological entity. It is in this entity that the experiences of being repressed, dislodged or never said have gained the possibility of being present.
1.2 Jurisprudence of substance: interpretation of Winnicot ideology
"Third presence" is not a static structure, but a continuous process of movement. The central engine driving the process is the dialectic movement described by Ogden: the presence of participants both as independent individuals and as part of an inter-entity continuum, with constant and dynamic tension between the two.
Core arguments
Ogden views the core of the entire psychoanalytic enterprise as a tracking "demonstrative movement between the individual subject matter and the subject matter (i.e. `third presence'). This is the driving heart of the theory: a continuous shock between "as an independent subject" and "as part of a co-created third subject". The dynamism and depth of the analytical process stems from the experience, tolerance and understanding of this dialectic.
Winnicott's paradox.
Ogden clearly extends the famous paradox of D.W. Winnicott - that "there is no such thing as an infant [part from the maternal situation] - to an analytical context. He submits that "in the context of the analysis, there is no dissociation from the analyst or from the analyst". This assertion is not intended to disintegrate the individual, but rather to emphasize that at the psychological level, the subject is constructed together in a relationship.
Dynamic tension
The key to this paradox is its dynamic nature. Ogden clarified that "the unitation of mother and child coexists in a dynamic form as an independent mother and infant". Similarly, in the analysis, the experience of the integration of analysts with those being analysed is in constant tension with their experience of independence. Therefore, the task of the analysis is not to "combine the elements that make up the relationship in order to determine which characteristics belong to whom", but to "describe the specific empirical nature of the conscious interaction between individual subjects and subjects". The foundation of the subject matter was established precisely in this dialectic of "recognized" and "recognized" subjects.
1.3 Generation of "third presence": meditation, asymmetries and retrospective understanding
If the dialectic campaign is the theoretical engine of the "third presence", the inherent experience of the analyst, especially his "reverie", is a key instrument for understanding and understanding the operation of the engine. This section will focus on how "third presence" forms and is perceived as a specific mechanism in clinical practice.
The role of the analyst in "discussion"
The main route for analysts to "third presence" is through his own "mentional experience". This includes psychological activities that seem unrelated to the patient and may even be perceived as distractions of work, such as "self-narcissistic self-infilmation, distraction", "banal delusions", body delusions, or even complete daydreams or illusions. Within the framework of Ogden's theory, these are not interferences that need to be overcome, but rather the form in which an analyst's mind unwittingly handles and confers on "third presence" an unspoken experience. They are conscious symbolic work carried out by analysts on patients ' experiences of non-linguisticity.
Accepting "uncertainty"
In order to be able to access and take advantage of these reflection materials, analysts must be able to "undertake their own uncomfortable feelings and feelings: for example, feel lost, frustrated, angry or confused". This requires analysts to have a special ability to "sit with unformed experience" and to resist the urge to seek certainty or interpretation prematurely. This ability to withstand uncertainty is a prerequisite for "third presence" to emerge and be understood.
Backtrace understanding.
"Third presence" is not "an event experienced in the same way by two participants". Its meaning and structure are often "retroactive, usually long after experience has taken place, and can be truly constructed and thought". This is a critical point: experience before understanding. Analysts and patients are first "living" in the "third presence" and then, at some point, usually through the intervention of analysts, come back to understanding what they have been through together.
This repositioning of the world within analysts has raised the subjective vulnerability of analysts - their ability to be lost, confused and moved by their own meditation - to the level of core technical principles. Classical psychoanalytic techniques emphasize the neutrality and anonymity of analysts and aim to create a projection "whiteboard". The individual feelings of analysts, "anti-movement", are often seen as obstacles that need to be managed and overcome through self-analysis. However, the Ogden model fundamentally subverts this view. The most private and seemingly irrelevant thinking of analysts ("the mediocre imagination") is precisely the source of data on the perception of "third person present" unconscious life. Therefore, the task of analysts is not to eliminate its subjectivity, but to "submit" to it and to use it. This requires a high degree of resilience to uncertainty and discomfort. This means that an "analytical attitude" is no longer an ultra-observative observation, but rather a deep, acceptable immersion. The personality, style and life experience of analysts are no longer a barrier, but a source of unique interaction with patients. This translates "use of the self" from a universal treatment principle to a specific psychoanalytic technique: a disciplined use of meditation to symbolize the co-creation of unconscious spaces. Analysts must be sufficiently vulnerable to be shaped by "third parties present" to understand it.
Part II. Clinical practice: "Third presence"
The vitality of the theory lies in the effectiveness of its clinical application. The Ogden concept of "third presence" has far-reaching implications precisely because it provides a strong framework for understanding and addressing the most delicate, complex and confusing moments in clinical practice. This section will explore in depth the expression of "third presence" in specific clinical work, and by analysing the detailed case materials of Ogden himself, show how this theory can be translated from abstract concepts to concrete treatment actions. We will look at the appearance of the "third presence", its pathological pattern of "conqueration", and the ultimate goal of treatment - to work beyond it.
2.1 Detailed case study: "Stories stolen"
In order to specify how the "third presence" works in reality, Ogden provides in his book a detailed clinical case entitled "The Stolen Letter". This case concerns him and a patient named Mr. L. By microanalyzing the treatment, we can see clearly how the theory is translated into practice.
Patient status
Mr. L has shown a state of deep emotional numbness, alienation and mechanization. He felt like he was living outside of an unreachable picture and could not feel intimate even with his wife and children. His dream was filled with "paralyzing people, prisoners and mutes", and one of the key dreams was that he tried to tear a stone apart and find internal hieroglyphics that could not be read. This dream has captured his core dilemma with precision: meaning seems within reach, but ultimately empty and desperate temptation. This state of "silence" sets the tone for the nature of the "third presence" to be co-created.
The reasoning of the analyst was revealed as the third presence.
In a treatment, the analyst's attention was drawn to an envelope on the table next to him. The envelope had existed for some time, but at that moment it suddenly became alive as a psychological event. The analyst's thoughts were a series of reflections around the envelope, which were not random thinking, but "third presence" giving Mr. L's unspoken experience concrete form
• Envelope details: The analyst first noticed the machine line on the envelope, which disappointed him as if the closeness of the letter was false. He then took note of the unsold stamps and the name of Mozart on them, a name that he was familiar with in different languages. Lastly, he realized that the address on the envelope had been typed with an old hand typewriter, a personalized and imperfect mark that made him feel a warmth of humanity. These seemingly irrelevant details are precisely the "third presence" that presents the core conflict of analysis in a specific sensory form: the tension between mechanical/humanization (mechanical lines, mass mail illusions) and humanity/personalization (Morzat's name, unique impression of a manual typewriter).
• Fantasies of the garage: the analyst's thoughts then drifted to an anxiety illusion that his car was at the repair plant and that he had to finish his treatment on time to pick it up before the garage closed. He vividly imagined himself being turned away by the ruthless garage owner, feeling helpless, angry and lonely. This illusion is not just an analysisr's personal life trouble, but a direct experience of Mr. L's core emotions in the "third presence". The analyst is "living" Mr. L's unspoken despair trapped in an unemotional, mechanical world (the mother who symbolizes what the patient describes as "brain death").
Intervention by analysts
The point is that analysts do not explain their meditation or illusions directly. He didn't say to Mr. L: "I think my garage fantasy represents your feeling of mother. "On the contrary, because he has been changed by the experience of "third presence" and he can
Talk from this common experience, not about it. His intervention was descriptive, not interpretative. He told the patients that he wanted them to be together for Mr. L to feel like a "no fun, no duty exercise, a bit like playing cards at a factory". He then added that he felt that Mr. L. sometimes felt so desperately suffocated in treatment that it must feel like he was suffocating in something that seemed to be a vacuum in the air. This intervention was strong because it arose directly from the mechanical and suffocation feelings experienced by analysts in their garage fantasy and envelope meditation.
Patient conversion
Mr. L's response was immediate and profound. His voice has become "greater and more full", as analysts have never heard before. He immediately linked the words of the analyst to his fear of suffocation at night and realized for the first time that the air in the treatment room was suffocating and suffocating him. This intervention broke the deadlock and allowed the physical feelings of repressed, former languages to enter the realm of consciousness and speech. In the next treatment, Mr. L reported a dream: he was underwater and found himself breathing. It is a powerful symbol of profound psychological transformation. The silent, suffocating "third presence" has been transformed into a living, breathing liquid medium.
2.2 "Covered Third" and Projectivation Identity
"Third presence" is not always creative and transformative space. In some cases, it can become a closed, pathological system, which Ogden calls "the subjugating third".
Definitions
Ogden has redefined projective identity into a special form of "third presence". In this form, "the individual subjectivity of the analyst and the subject is conquered by a co-created third analytical subject". This co-created subject is "third of conquest". It refers to a strong and unconscious pattern of interaction in which both sides are trapped and have lost their sense and ability to reflect as independent subjects.
Theory of the impasse
In this state, analysts and patients are trapped in an unconscious power cycle. This provides a very interpretative model for understanding the impasse in treatment, resistance and forced repetition of "enactment". In Mr. L's case, the silence, machinery and despair that prevailed in therapy before the intervention took place could be understood as an experience of "conquerive third". Both sides played unwittingly the role of the script, a numb patient and a similarly weak, thoughtless analyst.
Saturated signal
When analysts fail to realize that they are in the experience of "conquerive third", this may be a sign of "the healer's oversaturation". This means that the therapist has been completely overwhelmed by this co-creational dynamic and has lost the psychological distance necessary for reflection and symbolic work. At this point, the analyst is no longer a "third presence" observer and interpreter, but a mere prisoner.
2.3 Treatment Target: Beyond "third presence" through mutual recognition
If "occupying third" is the dilemma in treatment, the ultimate goal of analytical work is to find a way out of this integrated, conquered state of affairs and to regain the subjectivity of the individual.
Objective
"Successful analytical work involves going beyond `occupying third'". This is the core treatment action within the framework of the doctrine. The aim of treatment is not to eliminate the "third presence", but to transform its "conquerive" character into an experience that can be thought and understood.
Mechanisms
This is achieved through "mutual recognition of analysts and analysts as independent subjects". In Mr. L's case, when analysts were able to describe their common suffocation experience in language, he did two things at the same time: first, he admitted the pain that Mr. L had not said (recognizing others); and second, by saying that he had separated himself from that experience, he had re-established himself as an independent subject capable of thinking and feeling. It is this act of "recognizing the independence of others' minds while remaining connected" that breaks the closed circle of "suggestive third".
Recapturing Subject after Conversion
The result of going beyond "third presence" is "the repossession of their (converted) individual subject matter". It is important that participants do not simply return to their former status. They have been profoundly changed by the experience of the "third person present" who lived together. When a person is "returned" to himself by another person, it is itself a creative act that shapes a "first-time, more complete, more reflective subject". In his dream, Mr. L learned to breathe underwater, not to return to land, but to survive in a new, once deadly element. This symbolizes that his subjectivity has been transformed and enriched, not simply repaired.
Part III: Theoretical drawings: positioning "third presence"
No important theoretical concept exists in isolation. In order to fully understand the meaning and meaning of "third presence", it must be examined in a broader picture of mental analysis. The purpose of this section is to create a theoretical map of the relationship between the "third presence" and other core concepts in the psychoanalysis (e.g., transient-reverse, therapeutic framework) and to examine carefully the key differences between it and the different versions of the "third" concepts proposed by other theorists (e.g., Jessica Benjamin and Jacques Lacan). Through this comparison and positioning, we can more clearly grasp the uniqueness and contribution of the Ogden doctrine.
3.1 Beyond Migration - Reverse
"Third presence" does not simply add a new term to the traditional concept of transversence-courtertransference, but rather a fundamental recasting of the whole phenomenon area they describe.
A single inter-subject whole.
Ogden has clearly redefined migration and inversion as not "separable entities arising from mutual responses", but rather "two aspects of the whole of a single subject created by an analytical pair, experienced (and independent) by analysts". The "third presence" is this "total". In this framework, migration is no longer merely a repetition of the patient ' s past, nor is it a reaction by analysts to such repetition. Both are the emergence of the "third presence", a dynamic and unconscious field of individual experience.
From Double Psychology to Co-Creation
The traditional migration-reverse model usually implies a "two-person psychology" perspective where one's past is projected on another. The "third presence" model brings this perspective to the "co-creation" framework. The focus is on a sudden relationship process that "is not explicitly bound or identifiable as `belonging' to an analyst or to any of the persons being analysed". The material analysed is no longer simply attributed to "this is for the patient" or "this is for the analyst", but is understood to be the product of this "third subject".
It's a backlash as an entrance.
As noted in Part I, the status of counter-diversion, in particular the reasoning of analysts, has been radically changed. It is no longer merely a reaction to migration, but an indispensable way to reach the "understanding and interpretation of migration-reverse" arena. In other words, counter-transfer is the direct experience of analysts with "third presence". Analysts, through their own feelings, fantasies and body feelings, touch and understand this co-created unconscious space.
3.2 "Third sex" determination: Ogden, Benjamin and Lacan
In the psychoanalytic literature, the "third" is a concept that has been articulated by many ideologues from different angles, which can easily lead to confusion. It is therefore important to draw a careful distinction between the "third presence" of Ogden and the "third inter-subject" of Jessica Benjamin and the symbolic "third" of Jacques Lacan.
• "Analytical Third" by Ogden: This is a sudden, co-created, unconscious subject that emerges from the analysis of dualism interactions, especially through the process of projectivity. It can be either creative or "conquerive". It is a psychological entity that is actually "existent" in the analysis process.
Jessica Benjamin's "third in the body": this is a developmental achievement, representing a "potential space". In this space, "a sense of convergence of ideas" coexists with "acceptance of independence and difference". It is created through mutual recognition and submissiveness, and is the goal of a process among health agents, aimed at transcending the dichotomy of the doer/done-to. It describes more of a relationship than a psychological entity.
• The symbolic "third" of Jacques Lacan: the "father's name" (Name-of-the-Father), which represents law, culture and language. This third is structural, pre-existing. It does not emerge from the dualist relationship between the mother and the child, but rather from its involvement in the triangulation of order, thereby preventing it from falling into the imaginary relationship of symbiotic integration. It is the symbol of order itself.
To provide a clearer picture of the differences in these concepts, the table below compares them with several core dimensions
Features
Thomas Ogden's "Analytical Third" Jessica Benjamin's "Absolute Third" Jacques Lacan's symbolic "third"
Origin
From the unconscious interaction of the analysis of the binary.
It is achieved through a process of mutual recognition and submissive development.
It exists as a symbol of order (language, law, culture) before a dualism.
Nature
A "third subject" or psychological entity created jointly and having its own life. It can be "conquerive".
Quality/experiment of a "potential space" or inter-subject relationship. A state of relationship.
A structural principle, the "father's name", introduced symbolic dimensions.
Functions
To give form to unformed experiences; the medium of the analytical process itself. Treatment involves going beyond its conquerive forms.
Allowing bonds to coexist with separation; freeing ourselves from the complementarity of the "activators/actors".
The separation of the mother and child duality, the prevention of mental illness and the construction of a relationship between the subject and reality and desire.
Treatment target
Experience, symbolicization and, by mutual recognition, ultimately go beyond "third presence" to achieve transformation.
Create and maintain "third sex" as a medium of genuine connection and recognition.
Place the subject properly in symbolic order; analyse the relationship between the subject and "third".
3.3 "Third presence" and treatment framework
If "third presence" is an invisible psychological space, the therapeutic framework is the physical structure that accommodates it. There is a dialectical relationship between the "containers" and the "receivables".
Frame as Container
The "analytical framework" or "therapeutic framework" refers to a range of stabilization factors that make up the treatment context, including fixed time, location, cost, neutral attitude of analysts, etc. The function of this framework is to create a safe, secure and protected space, which is essential for the emergence and exploration of a "third presence". The framework establishes a clear boundary between the "internal" of treatment and the "external world".
"Third presence" as accommodation Objects
The "third presence" is a dynamic and unconscious process within the analytical space created by the framework. It is an "invisible spiritual space beyond the physical space in which it occurs". It is the stability, predictability and security provided by the framework that make it possible for analysts and patients to experience what is often a confusing, intense and confusing experience in the "third presence". Without a strong container, dynamic, but sometimes destructive, unconscious content cannot be safely experienced and transformed. The framework is therefore a prerequisite for the existence and work of a "third presence".
Part IV: Criticism, evolution and future vision
A living theory lies not only in its interpretation, but also in its ability to generate critical thinking, follow-up and response to new challenges. Since its introduction, the "third presence" theory has not only profoundly influenced clinical practice, but has also served as a source of further theoretical exploration and cross-cutting applications. This section will first look at the social history criticism of the Ogden theory, then follow its evolution and application in different areas, and finally provide an overview of its lasting impact and future significance in contemporary psychoanalysis.
4.1 Social history criticism
The study of psychoanalytic theory in the historical and cultural context in which it is produced is an important critical perspective. From this perspective, researchers have provided a profound analysis of the "third presence" theory, which they believe is not a general, permanent psychological discovery, but rather a product of a particular history of thought and social** patterns.
Links to romanticism
A key criticism is that Ogden's theory is conceptually very similar to that of the German romantic philosopher Friedrich Schelling. This similarity can be seen in several ways: in the perception of the subject matter as a creative act of self-setting; and in the perception that a new and larger entity emerges from a dialectic process. This link shows that Ogden ' s theory is deeply rooted in a specific context in the history of Western thinking, which emphasizes the characteristics of creativity, experience and creativity, echoing romantic thinking in favour of individual subjectivity and organic integrity. This criticism is not intended to devalue the theory, but rather to situate it from a purely clinical theory as a cultural product with a specific philosophical spectrum.
The product of late capitalism.
This criticism further extends to the socio-economic level, arguing that the theoretical model of "third presence" reflects the intrinsic logic of late capitalism. According to this analysis, the encounter of psychoanalysis is structured as a "interchange process relying on the production and consumption activities of the analysts". In this model, "analytical work takes the form of production and consumption of a `third' form", specifically through the "exchange of personal reflection experiences of analysts and analysts". This is a very challenging view, which interprets the profound process of psychotherapy as the production and exchange of a "psychological commodity" that corresponds to the logic of a consumer society. From this perspective, the "third presence" space, with its potential for creativity and transformation, may also be seen as a psychological pattern consistent with the ongoing quest of contemporary societies for novel experiences and individualized products.
4.2 Contemporary application and expansion
The impact of the "third presence" theory has gone beyond traditional psychoanalytic clinics, has been applied in a broader field and is facing new theoretical evolution as technology develops.
Organizational psychology
The concept has been successfully applied to organizational change and dynamic analysis. In the organizational environment, the "third presence" is seen as the psychological space that can "rehabilitate and integrate broken human systems". It represents the ground where real understanding and change can take place in duality, groups and communities when deeper emotional ties are established among members. This concept can be used by advisers or leaders to focus on and address unwitting, co-generated incentives within the organization, thus contributing to its healthy development.
Artificial Third: the role of artificial intelligence in psychotherapy
A recent and far-reaching development has been the conceptualization of the generation of artificial intelligence (such as ChatGPT) into the "artificial third" of therapeutic relationships. This raises a series of profound questions: how can a non-human entity reshape the inter-entity? How can it challenge the monopolistic position of human beings in terms of language, common ground and understanding? How can the ethical boundaries of treatment (e.g. autonomy, informed consent) be redefined when this "third" operating logic (calculations, training data) is largely non-transparent? The emergence of artificial third has forced us to rethink the core nature of human interaction, awareness and therapeutic relationships and has also given rise to entirely new topics for the future development of the "third presence" theory.
4.3 Concluding synthesis: the lasting impact of "third presence"
Taken together, Thomas Ogden's "third presence" theory has had a revolutionary impact on contemporary psychoanalytic thinking and practice. It is not only a fine clinical tool, it is a new world view of psychological reality and the process of treatment.
Model shift
The introduction of "third presence" marked a decisive shift in the psychoanalytic paradigm from "one-person psychology" to "two-person psychology" and placed "mainstream" at the heart of the theory. It ultimately establishes the notion that psychological reality is not in isolation within individuals, but is constantly being created together in relationships.
Redefinition of the role of analyst
The theory has completely reshaped the understanding of the role of analysts. Analysts are no longer a superb, objective interpreter, but a co-participator with full commitment. His entire existence - including his personality, his analytical style, his life experience and, above all, his ability to reflect - has become a central tool of treatment. This shift requires a high degree of self-awareness among analysts, resilience to uncertainty and emotional courage to remain fragile and open.
A living dynamic.
Ultimately, the concept of "third presence" transforms psychoanalysis from a static archaeological process (diggling the past) to a living, mobile and often surprising process of co-creation. The goal of treatment is no longer simply to gain "insight", but rather to generate new and more dynamic forms of subjective experience. It is not a theory of healing, but a theory of "becoming" - working with others to create a new self and, in the process, making life itself more prosperous and real.
Read about
Theatrical Lacanian theory in François Regnault's Audience
The Grammar of Events: Actor-Generated Topology (AGT) and the birth of a postmodern subject (up)
Theatre and Psychoanalysis
P4 Inputs to dental poetry: Preliminary interpretation of dark conceptual theory
P4 Theater, 10-year archive (partial)
The heterogeneity of Deleuze and contemporary art.
The politics of the screams of Deleuze and contemporary art.
Deleuze and Guattari and contemporary art
P4 Theater built a university, a crumbling maze, a hard drive engraving life.
Self-inflicted project "Tangshan Youth - The Artist's Final Book"
If you want to make a contribution or communicate, put it on. Long